Chapter 03
Matter and Energy
Matter is made from light and light is pure energy. We will discuss light further in later sections. For now, we only say that light is made from the vibrations of electromagnetic waves, just like everything else in the universe.
Everything has an energy, a frequency of Planck’s Constant h and therefore a size due to its wavelength. Energy is a measure of how fast each h spins. Matter results from a curl or twist of this vibration in three dimensions. Mass is a measure of the tightness of its spin. And its interaction with space-time.
When we talk about matter and energy in this book we are primarily concerned with matter in the form of fundamental particles and energy as in a photon of the electromagnetic field. This is not as we often relate with them in our macro world with its rocks and gasoline, for these are complicated compound entities and not elementary. Here, SED initially proposes a theory of how elementary particles are made from energy and then goes on to explore how these particles interact and build a universe from its abundant energy.
Physics often takes the difference between energy and matter for granted. However, SED distinguishes these two entities in this way: Energy has a two-dimensional structure, while matter has three, and SED shows us why. Consequently, matter has mass and inertia because its structure compresses space and has a resistance to changing its motion or accelerating through it.
Physics does however have a name for the elementary particles involved with each entity: boson and fermion, although it does not classify them through structure, for currently it maintains both are structureless. It also says that some particles which it claims are bosons have an enormous mass. Irrespective, a photon is a boson and has integral angular momentum (i.e. a spin of h). It carries energy but has no rest-mass. Fermions do have rest-mass and portray half-integral spin (i.e. a spin of h/2), but unlike SED, particle physics can offer no explanation why this is so.
It also categorises many other short-lived abstract entities like the Higgs boson, but these are not considered important by SED, because in the formation of matter, they have no role. Only during the destruction of matter, where they appear to exist momentarily, do they have any presence. However, this is according to certain indirect evidence, and even this is disputed by some. In this book SED maintains that only what is stable matters.
In the diagram of the Electromagnetic Spectrum shown below, we see that E-M waves cover a huge range of frequencies or sizes (their wavelengths) due to the different amounts of energy they carry. This frequency may form a continuum as any frequence can exist, provided the wave forms a whole complete wavelength. Another formula that expresses this idea is Planck’s equation or E = hf, which shows that the faster h spins, the more energy is involved in a direct or linear manner. This applies to both photons and particles.
It is interesting to note that Planck’s equation is concerned with the energy of photons, while Einstein’s famous equation E = mc2 relates to the energy in particles of matter and was written several years after Planck derived his law in 1900. Until now, these photons and particles have been thought of as quite different entities. However, these two equations are in fact completely identical and according to SED, energy and matter are merely different states of the same thing. That is, vibrating E-M waves. Matter is a state of energy.
Again, this is because of Planck’s constant and what it actually represents. It is the minimum or quantum of angular momentum, and it exists in all things. It could be thought of as a new kind of atom.
Its definition for particles is written as h = mcλ, where m = the particles mass, c = the speed of light, and λ is the Compton or circumferential wavelength[4] of the particle, be it matter or energy. Everything elementary is dynamic and circular and this is how their circle moves. It spins with energy.
And next we have Planck’s equation: E = hf. This ultimately means for every sub-atomic particle, everything turns and curls or spins with the power that it has. At this level, to have substance and in order to exist, it must spin, but as the definition of h is also h = mcλ, we can write Planck’s equation as: E = mcλf and because wavelength, λ times frequency, f is equal to the speed of the wave, c, this is the same as writing: E = mc2 or Einstein’s equation. Energy is mass and mass is energy locked in a soliton. A tiny volume of sustained vibration.
Like a gyroscope, it is rotational inertia of the E-M field as it spins that we perceive as mass, the inertia of the electric and magnetic fields constantly recreating themselves from confined or trapped energy, held inside the localised and compacted volume of space that is the soliton. The intense curvature of the path creates mass as Einstein so very nearly predicted with his general theory of gravitation. What he actually said was that matter curves space. However, what he should have said and what SED maintains is that matter compresses space because of the two loops in the roton and the magnetic attraction within them. It is this compression of space due to the volume matter occupies that causes inertia and gravity. We will discuss this in greater detail in later sections on the structure of the soliton and gravity.
For now we merely ask, could it be that space-time has a resistance to a changing volume when the particle moves through it unevenly as it accelerates, creating a kind of drag? This change in speed means varying momentum and a different kinetic energy and therefore the size or volume of its soliton changes. Is this what we call inertia and also why things can move forever at constant velocity or momentum?
And if so are matter and energy simply two different states of the same underlying phenomena: rapid vibrations of the E-M field, with vibrations that are only different in each state due to their structure and path? Each type is a quantum or full cycle of a wave that continually converts itself into its opposite in a sinusoidal and circular way, travelling at the speed of light as it does so. Each type always consists of exactly one unit of Planck’s constant, h, or spin per cycle.
Furthermore, both SED and the standard model concur that there are two types of fermion or mass particles: leptons and nucleons and both are involved in the construction of an atom. SED proposes a lepton always has the same single wave in its structure. It has only one state. However, a nucleon has one wave that splits into two equal probabilities due to the uncertainty principle and consequently can occupy two states. The simplest example of a lepton is the free electron, a single particle of generally stable matter. Nucleons are either protons or neutrons and can be both stable and somewhat unstable, in that they can transform into one another depending on their environment. They are also far more energetic than leptons and thus much smaller and denser.
The most common composite particle in the universe is an atom, a stable system made of both leptons and nucleons. While not fundamental, an atom follows the same basic ideas but has far greater levels of complexity, due to the number of particles and their various interactions. These interactions involve energy and angular momentum transfer amongst photons, electrons, neutrinos and fermions.
A photon is simply electromagnetic (E-M) field energy with the structure of a flat circle. It both spins and moves forward at the speed of light and thus forms a helix in space-time. Being purely energy transfer it has no real volume or rest-mass (i.e. zero mass when not moving). Its helical shape when in motion gives it somewhat of a three-dimensional form in space-time and consequently it portrays a very small virtual mass through the momentum it carries. Photons usually transfer some energy amongst fermions, though this amount is tiny in comparison to a fermions mass and depends on the interaction time through frequency. A single unit of angular momentum, or h, is always involved with each photon exchange.
It seems self-evident to SED that matter is just another form of energy, because how else could an electron instantly absorb and emit light when it changes energy levels from inside an atom? It is merely changing its size and structure slightly and emitting/absorbing what it already is. Light.
Light is one type of photon occupying the visible or mid-energy range within the E-M spectrum, but others exist with different frequencies, and all move at the speed of light or c with zero rest mass because they have zero volume. While it is well accepted[5] that matter creates and absorbs photons, we have seen that SED proposes the reverse and that highly energetic photons, or gamma rays can combine to create matter. The technology to do this experimentally is not yet available. Visible light and even X-ray photons cannot do this because they do not carry sufficient energy. Only gamma rays can.
Figure 11 – The electromagnetic spectrum. Thanks to Wikipedia
The two types of fermion in an atom, leptons, and nucleons, have a large energy/size difference, so the smaller denser nucleons primarily determine its centre of mass. The electron is not a point and does not revolve or orbit the nucleus but should be thought of as a dynamic field vibration or standing wave enfolding and surrounding the nucleus due to its larger size and smaller mass. It occupies the space as close as charge, the fine structure constant and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle allow. The overall size, number of particles and form is unique and generally stable for each type of atom. We will examine the structure of atoms in more detail in a later section.
Furthermore, to be useful, physics must measure and predict. That is why it is so heavily based on mathematics and formulates equations. However, it must also propose theories that explain how and why things happen in a manner that an interested person could follow. Unfortunately as it struggles to maintain credibility, modern physics can take us down a rabbit hole full of bizarre concepts like the Higgs boson, quarks, multi universes with eleven dimensions and time flowing backwards, but like all rabbit holes, the deeper it goes the more certain it is to become a dead end.
So much so that today, a great deal of particle physics is incomprehensible, inconsistent and incomplete. Very few people can understand or are interested in the standard model, and physics itself is unable to reconcile its theories of the very small with those of the very large. It is also unable to explain what over 90% of the universe actually is, following the discovery of dark matter and dark energy.
There is a story of a man who found a magnificent watch but was unable to fathom how it worked or even open it. He saw the hands going round and round in a regular fashion but knew not how or why. Frustrated, he eventually picked up a sledgehammer and hit it hard, smashing it to pieces. Is this what we are doing at CERN – building bigger sledgehammers?
This book offers a theory about how to create matter, not destroy it.
So, what is an origin of everything, and dare we hope to find it by theorising unusual new ideas? For the second question, I think the answer is a resounding yes, although birth and change are often painful necessities. The first though, will take much longer to digest with considerable thought and debate, most of it new, because until now there have not been any proposed theories that successfully unify a broken physics.
To advance this theory we will enlist the aid of a new branch of physics called Structural Electrodynamics or SED. Originally, this was primarily concerned with how elementary particles are created from energy and offered a model to do this. However, here it also proposes a universal system based on this model whereby all structure and interactions in the universe have a common underlying component that can be readily understood. A world in a grain of sand that we can hold in the palm of our hand.
There is structure in everything from atoms to galaxies. Why can’t we accept that elementary particles also have structure?
[4] Its radius is ƛ (lambda-bar) or λ/2π. Using this, Planck’s constant this becomes ћ and is known as its reduced value. Compton’s wavelength refers to the wavelength light would have if it had the same mass as the particle.
[5] This theory is called quantum electrodynamics or QED. See [3] (Chapter 2) for further info.
The Origin of Everything
(Online Edition)